RollerCoaster Tycoon Wiki:Community Portal: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 00:35, 30 May 2012

2009 Archive | 2010 Archive | 2011 Archive

This is the best place to discuss the wiki between all users.

I noticed that RCT2 expansion scenarios are - well - blank pages. Do we have any scenario strategies among our many users for those?

Also, I've started noting RCT3 remakes of scenarios; all of the main RCT ones are remade as well as a good chunk of RCT expansions and the entire main RCT2 scenario list. I think it's good to highlight that these exist. So far, Forest Frontiers and Dynamite Dunes have been noted. CycloneGU 00:09, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

The scenario pages for RCT2 and RCT3 are a mess to be honest :(. I think this RCT in 3D website should be noted, but not on every single page, rather a single page entirely for the website.

Lachlan5963

19:16, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

How would you propose doing that? I do agree that adding it to every single page seems somewhat messy and was considering removing the Dynamite Dunes addition of mine, but leaving the Forest Frontiers entry. In addition, a general mention somewhere. Haven't figured out the best way to go about it yet. CycloneGU 19:21, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

I think we could note it on the RollerCoaster Tycoon page - I'm actually thinking a page for every fansite is a bit much, I might merge them all in to a single page.

Lachlan5963

14:59, May 29, 2012 (UTC)

Do we presently have fan sites with dedicated articles? I agree, that is excessive. I was thinking for this case we can leave the Forest Frontiers entry (noting how the scenario was made into a much more difficult version) and have an entry somewhere else that refers to it as well. I didn't mean its own article, though it's been around long enough that it could probably merit one...but I don't think fansites should have articles. CycloneGU 00:35, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :The scenario pages for [[RCT2]] and [[RCT3]] are a mess to be honest :(. I think this RCT in 3D website should be noted, but not on every single page, rather a single page entirely for the website.[[File:Oblivion Logo.png|20px]][[User:Lachlan5963|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;">Lachlan5963</span>''']][[File:Oblivion Logo.png|20px]] 19:16, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
-::How would you propose doing that?  I do agree that adding it to every single page seems somewhat messy and was considering removing the Dynamite Dunes addition of mine, but leaving the Forest Frontiers entry.  In addition, a general mention somewhere.  Haven't figured out the best way to go about it yet.  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] 19:21, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
+::How would you propose doing that? I do agree that adding it to every single page seems somewhat messy and was considering removing the Dynamite Dunes addition of mine, but leaving the Forest Frontiers entry. In addition, a general mention somewhere. Haven't figured out the best way to go about it yet. [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] 19:21, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
 :::I think we could note it on the [[RollerCoaster Tycoon]] page - I'm actually thinking a page for every fansite is a bit much, I might merge them all in to a single page.[[File:Oblivion Logo.png|20px]][[User:Lachlan5963|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;">Lachlan5963</span>''']][[File:Oblivion Logo.png|20px]] 14:59, May 29, 2012 (UTC)
+::::Do we presently have fan sites with dedicated articles?  I agree, that is excessive.  I was thinking for this case we can leave the Forest Frontiers entry (noting how the scenario was made into a much more difficult version) and have an entry somewhere else that refers to it as well.  I didn't mean its own article, though it's been around long enough that it could probably merit one...but I don't think fansites should have articles.  [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] 00:35, May 30, 2012 (UTC)