Talk:Three Monkeys Park: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Tidying up and adding unsigned templates) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= |
==Could Have Been Better== |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Apparently someone thought it is a good idea to demolish the three roller coasters you start with. Why demolish them when they will make alot of money? [[User:Sangkyunpark|Sangkyunpark]] 21:21, January 23, 2011 (UTC)Sangkyunpark |
Apparently someone thought it is a good idea to demolish the three roller coasters you start with. Why demolish them when they will make alot of money? [[User:Sangkyunpark|Sangkyunpark]] 21:21, January 23, 2011 (UTC)Sangkyunpark |
||
I had great problems with guests getting lost in the park until I have built a second pathway to the exit. I did not touch the initial rollercoasters, so that was quite tricky to construct. [[User:Sucinum|Sucinum]] 12:15, December 11, 2011 (UTC) |
I had great problems with guests getting lost in the park until I have built a second pathway to the exit. I did not touch the initial rollercoasters, so that was quite tricky to construct. [[User:Sucinum|Sucinum]] 12:15, December 11, 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:23, 11 August 2012
Could Have Been Better
It was good but always in my mind could have been better—Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.21.39 (talk • contribs) 17:49, September 8, 2005.
I agree. The roller coasters were cool and all, but the park wasn't that great to work with.—Preceding unsigned comment added by RCT Fan (talk • contribs) 15:51, September 12, 2005.
Apparently someone thought it is a good idea to demolish the three roller coasters you start with. Why demolish them when they will make alot of money? Sangkyunpark 21:21, January 23, 2011 (UTC)Sangkyunpark
I had great problems with guests getting lost in the park until I have built a second pathway to the exit. I did not touch the initial rollercoasters, so that was quite tricky to construct. Sucinum 12:15, December 11, 2011 (UTC)